http://www.nypost.com/seven/07142008/news/regionalnews/faa_kids_are_in_control_119827.htm

LOL! The FAILED Aviation Administration is no ****ed up they
got to troll for High School kids to brainwash and force to
endure Malaysian tennis shoe factory work conditions on the
job guiding aluminum tubes full of people at 600 miles and hour

Hey white kids who work for the FAA get ready to "Kiss that
Black Ass"!!!

Alls the FAA Guvment bosses be colored you know...

Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.


Bertie

On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> Obviously since they once hired you.
>
> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
> drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

"george" > wrote in message
...
> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>
>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
>> drive one to.
>
> Ah !
> So that's what his beef is....
> And racist too.
> He's an all round loser

I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most realize.

Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful purpose
just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most NATCA
members feel the same way and are very productive employees.

Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining the
union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they feel it
provides them with protection and intimidation from management who would
surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably some truth
here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to identify. They wear
their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll find them coming back from
break early just so they can jump into the flight data position or they
might volunteer for other non operational tasks or they might just find a
good place to hide. They will do anything to keep from working airplanes,
because they know if they do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some
worm their way into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial
complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.

george wrote:
> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>
>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
>> drive one to.
>
> Ah !
> So that's what his beef is....
> And racist too.
> He's an all round loser


AND THE FAA MANAGEMENT SYCOPHANTS SPEAK

Mike wrote:
> "george" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>>
>>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
>>> drive one to.
>>
>> Ah !
>> So that's what his beef is....
>> And racist too.
>> He's an all round loser
>
> I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most realize.
>
> Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful
> purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
> NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive employees.
>
> Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
> controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
> the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
> feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from management
> who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably
> some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to
> identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll
> find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
> flight data position or they might volunteer for other non operational
> tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will do
> anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they do it
> enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way into full
> time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.
>
> There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
> category.


The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.

Most FAA managers are also LOSERS or STUPID so they go into
management, strap on the goose down knee pads blow a little
cock and before you know it they have risen to their level
of incompetence and inadequacy

Which one of those categories do you fit?? Mike......???

BlackHawk wrote:
> Mike wrote:
>> "george" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>>>
>>>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation
>>>> should drive one to.
>>>
>>> Ah !
>>> So that's what his beef is....
>>> And racist too.
>>> He's an all round loser
>>
>> I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
>> realize. Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and
>> useful
>> purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
>> NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive
>> employees. Then you have those that fall into another category. You have
>> some
>> controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
>> the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
>> feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from
>> management who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union
>> (there's
>> probably some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty
>> easy to identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve.
>> You'll
>> find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
>> flight data position or they might volunteer for other non
>> operational tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will
>> do anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they
>> do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way
>> into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.
>>
>> There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
>> category.
>
>
> The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
> it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
> bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.
>

That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
a controller.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
> BlackHawk wrote:
>> Mike wrote:
>>> "george" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation
>>>>> should drive one to.
>>>> Ah !
>>>> So that's what his beef is....
>>>> And racist too.
>>>> He's an all round loser
>>> I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
>>> realize. Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and
>>> useful
>>> purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
>>> NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive
>>> employees. Then you have those that fall into another category. You have
>>> some
>>> controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
>>> the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
>>> feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from
>>> management who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union
>>> (there's
>>> probably some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty
>>> easy to identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve.
>>> You'll
>>> find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
>>> flight data position or they might volunteer for other non
>>> operational tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will
>>> do anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they
>>> do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way
>>> into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.
>>>
>>> There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
>>> category.
>>
>> The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
>> it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
>> bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.
>>
>
> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
> hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
> a controller.
>
>

Where is your facility? OZ?

BTW you let the cat out of the bag. It is precisely why the
FAA is so ****ed up. Why is ANY FAA manager a product of a
washed out controller, minority or golf buddy?

Don't you know the culture in the FAA falls into two
categories??

1. **** up move up or...........
2. Be a minority or demonstrate your ability to "Kiss the
Black Ass"


Since when did aviation qualifications come into play in the
FAA??

Like I said, your facility must be somewhere near OZ

On 2008-07-22, Steven P. McNicoll > wrote:
> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
> hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
> a controller.

Since I've once again taken up flying, it's become obvious to me that there
are far more controllers who understand it's a cooperative effort between
controllers and pilots that keeps people safe, and who are willing to do
what they can to help folks through crowded airspace safely. There are a
bunch of really professional folks on the other side of that microphone.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)

On Jul 23, 11:34 am, BlackHawk > wrote:
> george wrote:
> > On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> Obviously since they once hired you.
>
> >> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
> >> drive one to.
>
> > Ah !
> > So that's what his beef is....
> > And racist too.
> > He's an all round loser
>
> AND THE FAA MANAGEMENT SYCOPHANTS SPEAK

You've got the wrong country son

BlackHawk wrote:
>>>
>>> The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
>>> it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
>>> bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.
>>>
>>
>> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad
>> controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are
>> managers that can't hack it as a controller.
>>
>
> Where is your facility? OZ?
>

US


>
> BTW you let the cat out of the bag. It is precisely why the
> FAA is so ****ed up. Why is ANY FAA manager a product of a
> washed out controller, minority or golf buddy?
>
> Don't you know the culture in the FAA falls into two
> categories??
>
> 1. **** up move up or...........
> 2. Be a minority or demonstrate your ability to "Kiss the
> Black Ass"
>
>
> Since when did aviation qualifications come into play in the
> FAA??
>

Rarely. Why does NATCA protect bad controllers?


>
> Like I said, your facility must be somewhere near OZ
>

No, the US.

Jay Maynard wrote:
> On 2008-07-22, Steven P. McNicoll > wrote:
>> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad
>> controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are
>> managers that can't hack it as a controller.
>>
>
> Since I've once again taken up flying, it's become obvious to me that
> there are far more controllers who understand it's a cooperative
> effort between controllers and pilots that keeps people safe, and who
> are willing to do what they can to help folks through crowded
> airspace safely. There are a bunch of really professional folks on
> the other side of that microphone.
>

True dat. There are also some pretty lousy controllers who remain on the
other side of that microphone primarily due to the efforts of NATCA.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
> Jay Maynard wrote:
>> On 2008-07-22, Steven P. McNicoll > wrote:
>>> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad
>>> controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are
>>> managers that can't hack it as a controller.
>>>
>> Since I've once again taken up flying, it's become obvious to me that
>> there are far more controllers who understand it's a cooperative
>> effort between controllers and pilots that keeps people safe, and who
>> are willing to do what they can to help folks through crowded
>> airspace safely. There are a bunch of really professional folks on
>> the other side of that microphone.
>>
>
> True dat. There are also some pretty lousy controllers who remain on the
> other side of that microphone primarily due to the efforts of NATCA.
>
>


For all you stepford Bush ass lickers and management
sycophants and boot kissers

REPEAT AFTER ME

Demonize ALL organized labor
Iraq is not about oil or the military industrial complex
Marijuana is a terrible drug and the beer industry is OK
We are the Borg(Republicans)
We WILL assimilate YOU
Resistance is futile


Did you know the typical FAA Manager only takes 22 seconds
to train?

All he has to remember is 3 simple responses

"BLAME NATCA"
Safety was never compromised
ALL IS WELL


FUBAR
TANGO UNIFORM
BOOM
SOON

BlackHawk wrote:
>>
>> True dat. There are also some pretty lousy controllers who remain
>> on the other side of that microphone primarily due to the efforts of
>> NATCA.
>
>
> For all you stepford Bush ass lickers and management
> sycophants and boot kissers
>
> REPEAT AFTER ME
>
> Demonize ALL organized labor
> Iraq is not about oil or the military industrial complex
> Marijuana is a terrible drug and the beer industry is OK
> We are the Borg(Republicans)
> We WILL assimilate YOU
> Resistance is futile
>
>
> Did you know the typical FAA Manager only takes 22 seconds
> to train?
>
> All he has to remember is 3 simple responses
>
> "BLAME NATCA"
> Safety was never compromised
> ALL IS WELL
>
>
> FUBAR
> TANGO UNIFORM
> BOOM
> SOON
>

How many FAA managers are former NATCA members? How many of them would have
washed out as trainees and not be managers today if NATCA hadn't had a
policy of protecting every dues paying member without regard to their
ability to do the job?

"BlackHawk" > wrote in message
...
> Mike wrote:
>> "george" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>>>
>>>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
>>>> drive one to.
>>>
>>> Ah !
>>> So that's what his beef is....
>>> And racist too.
>>> He's an all round loser
>>
>> I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
>> realize.
>>
>> Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful
>> purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
>> NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive employees.
>>
>> Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
>> controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining the
>> union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they feel it
>> provides them with protection and intimidation from management who would
>> surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably some truth
>> here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to identify. They
>> wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll find them coming
>> back from break early just so they can jump into the flight data position
>> or they might volunteer for other non operational tasks or they might
>> just find a good place to hide. They will do anything to keep from
>> working airplanes, because they know if they do it enough they will
>> eventually screw up. Some worm their way into full time NATCA positions.
>> They are all perennial complainers.
>>
>> There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
>> category.
>
>
> The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack" it as a
> controller or technician is much greater than a few bad controllers who
> hide behind the apron of NATCA.
>
> Most FAA managers are also LOSERS or STUPID so they go into management,
> strap on the goose down knee pads blow a little cock and before you know
> it they have risen to their level of incompetence and inadequacy
>
> Which one of those categories do you fit?? Mike......???

I thought you plonked me.

I guess you weren't smart enough to figure that one out either, and now I'm
hitting a bit too close to home for you to keep your mouth shut, so you
invent a new sock puppet as if that's really going to fool anyone.

"BlackHawk" > wrote in message
...
> Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
>> BlackHawk wrote:
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>> "george" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>>> Obviously since they once hired you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation
>>>>>> should drive one to.
>>>>> Ah !
>>>>> So that's what his beef is....
>>>>> And racist too.
>>>>> He's an all round loser
>>>> I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
>>>> realize. Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and
>>>> useful
>>>> purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
>>>> NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive
>>>> employees. Then you have those that fall into another category. You
>>>> have some
>>>> controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
>>>> the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
>>>> feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from
>>>> management who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union
>>>> (there's
>>>> probably some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty
>>>> easy to identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve.
>>>> You'll
>>>> find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
>>>> flight data position or they might volunteer for other non
>>>> operational tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They
>>>> will do anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if
>>>> they
>>>> do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way
>>>> into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.
>>>>
>>>> There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
>>>> category.
>>>
>>> The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
>>> it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
>>> bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.
>>>
>>
>> That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers
>> who hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't
>> hack it as a controller.
>
> Where is your facility? OZ?

What facility did you wash out of, and which low level hole did NATCA
negotiate for you to rot away the rest of your career in?

Just wondering.